a short history of hungerton & wyville
1700-1770 and the Enclosures
The great majority of the parish, being in the ownership of the Gregory family, changed only slightly over the next 70 years. The two main alterations were the addition of a new farmstead out by Three Queens (which was eventually demolished in the third quarter of the 1900s) and, eventually, an enclosure award for Wyville Heath.
To appreciate the desire to enclose the heath we need to understand contemporary agricultural thinking. Innovations in agricultural practice finally made it possible to cultivate all but the poorest soils by crop rotation. Multiple land uses were ‘despised’, bracken and ling were no longer regarded as crops and rabbits had begun to be disapproved of (rather than seen as a valuable food source). The enclosure of land also conferred on owners absolute rights over their properties (moving away from common grazing land), and contemporary writers were extolling the virtues of ‘reclamation’ and drawing attention to the significant rent increases that could be obtained.
Therefore the enclosure of Wyville Heath would have been seen by the Gregory’s as an excellent way of increasing the productivity of The Estate, and they paid £800 for the privilege. For comparison, the average worker in 1770 was earning seven shillings a week, there are 20 shillings in a pound, so £800 is the equivalent of 44 years income.
The addition of so much newly reclaimed and enclosed land meant that new buildings also had to be built to serve it. Not only was this an agricultural necessity but a financial one too, as the existing farms wouldn’t produce an increase in rent without the infrastructure to support their newly allotted land. This included improving and extending Hungerton Farm (now Field House), and both Beech and Sycamore Farms at Wyville, as well as creating a new outlying set of buildings and a yard at Wyville Lodge.
The site selected for the Hall, “seated on an eminence“, at one of the highest points in Lincolnshire (137m above sea level), commanded fine views over much of the parish. What Gregory appears to have underestimated, however, was the downside of the position he’d chosen – exposure to the elements. The only shelter from the winds were a few thin trees to the north west and, considering the prevailing winds come from the south, the new building was very exposed.
At the end of his first winter there, Gregory wrote to Sir Thomas Hartnell, explaining the fact that the loss of his mother had frustrated his plan of happiness and that he found the location of the Hall “particularly inconvenient on many accounts“. Apart from it being “out of the line of communication with the neighbourhood” it was “also very naked and bleak that it will by no means do for a winter residence“.
There is little doubt that Gregory’s comments were heartfelt. Not only was the Hall very exposed, but several of the 1780s winters were exceptionally lengthy and cold – some so bitter that the Thames froze over. [Thankfully freezing winters at Hungerton Hall are now a thing of the past since the recent addition of a 250kW biomass boiler, that takes up the size of a small house, and provides an endless supply of hot water and heating to the Hall and surrounding cottages]
As a side note, Gregory de Ligne Gregory, the nephew of George (who inherited from his uncle in 1822), lived at Hungerton whilst he built another notable property, Harlaxton Manor, which was completed in 1845, and situated two and a half miles from Hungerton. Its construction combines elements of Jacobean and Elizabethan styles with symmetrical Baroque structures, making it unique among surviving Jacobethan manors. Harlaxton Manor is now the British campus for the University of Evansville.
Once the war was over, Sir Denis and Lady Elizabeth Le Marchant decided to repair and return to the Hall – the state that the army had relinquished it in was so poor that serious consideration was given as to whether to pull the entire structure down.
Other significant changes included the demolition of the Homestead farm at Three Queens, most of the old farm buildings at Hungerton Farm, some at Beech Farm and the derelict (by the early fifties) limestone cottages at The City. The Methodist Chapel and Burton’s Farmhouse at Wyville were also demolished, as well as most of the outlying buildings at Wyville Lodge (including all of the WWII buildings). In their place Hungerton Farm acquired a modern farmstead, the stone cottages in Hungerton Dip were extended, the White Cottages (next to St Catherine’s Church) were built and the cottages behind the Hall extended.
It is said that prior to their sale of The Estate, the Pearson Gregory’s felled all the valuable timber at Hungerton and Wyville to pay death duties. Much of the remaining woodland was lost in a severe gale at the end of the war. Other serious losses, particularly from the hedgerows, were caused by a storm in January 1976, and Dutch Elm Disease, which arrived on The Estate in the late 1970s. In response to these losses, starting in 1947, replanting the woodland became a priority, with the total land now given to woodland extending to some 35 hectares.
Sir Denis died in 1987, and Lady LeMarchant took on the mantle of running the estate for the next thirty years – although in all fairness she was very active here whilst Sir Denis was alive. She did pass some of the ownership of The Estate to her son, Sir Francis Le Marchant, a respected painter, who died in January, 2016. Lady LeMarchant died a few months later, aged 103, still overseeing the day-to-day operation of the estate until a couple of months before her death. The Hall is now occupied by her granddaughter, Isabel, and her family.
A Note of Thanks:
This history wouldn’t have been possible without the work of John Popham, planning and environmental consultant, who produced a history of Hungerton and Wyville for the Heritage Landscape Management Plan in June, 1999. Any errors or omissions are purely the fault of the author.